Supreme Court of India drops guide to respectful disability language

As a disabled writer, I have witnessed firsthand how language can shape perceptions, attitudes, and ultimately, the treatment of individuals with disabilities.

So, when the Supreme Court of India recently launched a handbook to redefine the conversation around disability, my heart swelled with hope.

This isn’t just a legal document; it’s a call to action for all of us to rethink how we speak about disability.

Chief Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud emphasised the power of language in the courtroom and beyond, stating that stereotypes and biases can subtly influence legal proceedings at the handbook’s unveiling.

This resonates deeply with me and countless others who have faced the brunt of misguided assumptions.

How often have we been labelled as “brave” or “heroic” merely for existing? It’s time to dismantle these stereotypes and advocate for language that reflects our humanity, not our limitations.

The handbook explicitly discourages derogatory terms like “crippled,” “retard,” and “loony.” These words not only belittle our experiences but also contribute to a culture of stigma.

In a society that is often quick to judge, it’s crucial to use language that respects our dignity. It’s a reminder that we are individuals first, with unique stories and identities beyond our disabilities.

As someone who has navigated the complexities of living with a disability, I find the emphasis on respectful language refreshing.

Chief Justice Chandrachud shared his personal experience with his foster daughters, who were born with a genetic condition. His story highlights the journey that comes with understanding disability on a deeper level. It’s about love, purpose, and a commitment to fostering an inclusive society where every child, regardless of their abilities, is cherished.

But the handbook isn’t just about what to say or not to say; it addresses a critical gap in our legal system: data collection.

The Chief Justice pointed out that the lack of reliable data on children with disabilities, especially those who have experienced abuse or come into conflict with the law, is a significant challenge. Without accurate data, how can we expect to create effective policies that protect and empower disabled individuals?

The call for better data collection is a plea for accountability and meaningful reform.

This handbook is a powerful tool for change, but it’s not the end of the road. It’s a stepping stone toward a more inclusive society that values every individual.

By encouraging legal professionals, policymakers, and everyday citizens to adopt inclusive terminology, we can change the narrative around disability. The language we use can either uplift or diminish our experiences, and it’s time to choose words that uplift.

As we move forward, let’s take this opportunity to engage in conversations about disability that are respectful, informed, and compassionate.

The Supreme Court’s initiative is a significant leap toward breaking down barriers and fostering understanding. But it’s up to each of us to carry this message forward, ensuring that our words reflect the dignity and complexity of our lives.